{"id":1666,"date":"2018-08-16T14:54:30","date_gmt":"2018-08-16T12:54:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/?p=1666"},"modified":"2018-08-22T14:17:41","modified_gmt":"2018-08-22T12:17:41","slug":"nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/","title":{"rendered":"N\u00e5gra kommentarer och klarl\u00e4gganden efter oredlighetsbeslutet den 25 juni"},"content":{"rendered":"

English version below<\/strong><\/p>\n

Flera av de som \u00e4r ber\u00f6rda av beslutet den 25<\/a> juni om oredlighet i forskning (g\u00e4llande Macchiarini-\u00e4rendet) har \u00f6verklagat beslutet till f\u00f6rvaltningsr\u00e4tten respektive beg\u00e4rt ompr\u00f6vning av beslutet hos KI. Vi har ocks\u00e5 f\u00e5tt fr\u00e5gor om vad begreppet klanderv\u00e4rd egentligen st\u00e5r f\u00f6r och vilka konsekvenser det kan t\u00e4nkas f\u00e5. Jag t\u00e4nkte d\u00e4rf\u00f6r h\u00e4r g\u00f6ra n\u00e5gra klarl\u00e4gganden.<\/p>\n

Jag tar synpunkter g\u00e4llande beslutet p\u00e5 st\u00f6rsta allvar och vi har nu inlett ett prioriterat arbete med att se \u00f6ver de eventuella fr\u00e5getecken som kan finnas. Det \u00e4r oklart n\u00e4r f\u00f6rvaltningsr\u00e4ttens beslut kommer, men det \u00e4r min f\u00f6rhoppning att det blir relativt snart. Jag avvaktar med eventuella kommentarer om detta till dess.<\/p>\n

Begreppet klanderv\u00e4rd<\/strong><\/h4>\n

N\u00e4r det g\u00e4ller begreppet klanderv\u00e4rd noterar jag att det finns en viss oklarhet om hur det ska tolkas.<\/p>\n

I bed\u00f6mningarna av det individuella ansvaret i detta \u00e4rende finner KI att tre kategorier l\u00e4mpligen kan anv\u00e4ndas f\u00f6r att nyansera bed\u00f6mningen i detta fall d\u00e4r forskningen som redovisas i artiklarna bed\u00f6mts vara oredlighet i forskning. Dessa kategorier \u00e4r \u201dansvarig f\u00f6r oredlighet i forskning\u201d, \u201dklanderv\u00e4rd\u201d, vilket inneb\u00e4r att man inte anses ansvarig f\u00f6r oredlighet i forskning, men att man inte kan undg\u00e5 kritik samt \u201dej ansvarig f\u00f6r oredlighet i forskning eller klanderv\u00e4rd\u201d.<\/p>\n

S\u00e5 l\u00e5t mig vara alldeles klar och tydlig med att klanderv\u00e4rd betyder att man \u00e4r friad fr\u00e5n oredlighet i forskning. Samtidigt finns det anledning att rikta viss kritik mot forskaren ifr\u00e5ga. KI:s huvudlinje \u00e4r att dessa forskares f\u00f6ruts\u00e4ttningar, finansiering och villkor f\u00f6r att bedriva forskningsverksamhet inte ska p\u00e5verkas.<\/p>\n

Kollektivt ansvar?<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Expertgruppen f\u00f6r oredlighet i forskning vid Centrala etikpr\u00f6vningsn\u00e4mnden<\/a> gjorde i sitt yttrande i \u00e4rendet 2017 bed\u00f6mningen att samtliga f\u00f6rfattare till de sex artiklarna \u00e4r ansvariga f\u00f6r oredlighet i forskning. Jag och KI delar inte Expertgruppens syn p\u00e5 ett kollektivt ansvar. V\u00e5r slutsats \u00e4r att forskningen som redovisas i de aktuella artiklarna representerar oredlighet i forskning, men att alla f\u00f6rfattare inte kan anses ha samma ansvar. Det \u00e4r mot denna bakgrund vi har utrett och bed\u00f6mt varje medverkande f\u00f6rfattares individuella ansvar s\u00e5 l\u00e5ngt det varit m\u00f6jligt.<\/p>\n

I beslutstexten diskuterar vi detta och skriver bland annat f\u00f6ljande:<\/p>\n

\u201dDet kan diskuteras i vilken utstr\u00e4ckning medf\u00f6rfattare har m\u00f6jlighet och kan ta ansvar f\u00f6r varandras dataset. Expertgruppen finner att s\u00e5dant ansvar m\u00e5ste f\u00f6religga f\u00f6r samtliga. \u00c4ven KI anser att medf\u00f6rfattarna har en skyldighet att s\u00e4tta sig in i varandras forskningsresultat men att det i h\u00f6gspecialiserad medicinsk forskning kan vara sv\u00e5rt att g\u00f6ra detta helt och h\u00e5llet. I slut\u00e4ndan m\u00e5ste \u00e4ven forskningssamarbetet bygga p\u00e5 f\u00f6rtroende. Vancouverreglerna \u00e4ndrades ocks\u00e5 i detta avseende 2013.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Some comments and clarifications following the 25 June decision<\/h1>\n

Some of those affected by the 25 June decision<\/a> regarding scientific misconduct (related to the Macchiarini case) have filed an appeal against the decision with the Administrative Court, and some have requested a review of the decision at KI. We have also received questions about the concept \u201cblameworthy\u201d \u2013 what it means and what consequences it may have. I would therefore like to make some clarifications.<\/p>\n

I take comments about the decision very seriously, and we have now initiated and prioritized a process to review any questions that may exist. It is unclear when the Administrative Court will announce its decision, but I hope it will be relatively soon; I will make further comments on the matter at that time.<\/p>\n

The concept blameworthy<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Regarding the concept of \u201cblameworthy\u201d, I have noted that there is some uncertainty about how it should be interpreted.<\/p>\n

In assessing individual responsibility in this case, KI finds in this case that three categories can appropriately be used to nuance assessments when the research reported in the articles is considered to be scientific misconduct. These categories are “responsible for scientific misconduct”, “blameworthy” \u2013 which means that the researcher is not responsible for scientific misconduct, but is not beyond criticism \u2013 and “not responsible for scientific misconduct or blameworthy”.<\/p>\n

So let me be clear that \u201cblameworthy\u201d means freed from scientific misconduct<\/em>. At the same time, there is reason to address certain criticisms of the researcher in question. KI’s stance is that these researchers’ funding and conditions for conducting research activities should not be affected.<\/p>\n

Collective responsibility?<\/strong><\/h4>\n

In its statement in 2017, the Expert Group on Misconduct in Research at the Central Ethical Review Board (Centrala etikpr\u00f6vningsn\u00e4mnden) made the assessment that all authors of the six articles are responsible for scientific misconduct. We do not share the Expert Group’s view of collective responsibility. Our conclusion is that the research reported in the articles in question represents scientific misconduct, but that all authors cannot be regarded as having the same responsibility. It is against this background that we have assessed the individual responsibilities of each participating author.<\/p>\n

In the decision text we discuss this and include the following:<\/p>\n

\u201cIt can be discussed to what extent each individual author can take on responsibility for each other\u2019s contributions for each article. The Expert Group finds that such responsibility lies with each contributing author. KI also considers that the authors has an obligation to familiarize themselves with results of coauthors, but that in highly specialized medical research it may be difficult to do so in every detail. In the end collaborative research must rely on confidence. The Vancouver rules were changed in this respect in 2013.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

English version below Flera av de som \u00e4r ber\u00f6rda av beslutet den 25 juni om oredlighet i forskning (g\u00e4llande Macchiarini-\u00e4rendet) har \u00f6verklagat beslutet till f\u00f6rvaltningsr\u00e4tten respektive beg\u00e4rt ompr\u00f6vning av beslutet […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":100,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[128,26],"tags":[242,225,30],"class_list":["post-1666","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ethics","category-research","tag-ethics","tag-forskning","tag-research"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nN\u00e5gra kommentarer och klarl\u00e4gganden efter oredlighetsbeslutet den 25 juni - Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet 2017-2023<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"N\u00e5gra kommentarer och klarl\u00e4gganden efter oredlighetsbeslutet den 25 juni - Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet 2017-2023\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"English version below Flera av de som \u00e4r ber\u00f6rda av beslutet den 25 juni om oredlighet i forskning (g\u00e4llande Macchiarini-\u00e4rendet) har \u00f6verklagat beslutet till f\u00f6rvaltningsr\u00e4tten respektive beg\u00e4rt ompr\u00f6vning av beslutet […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet 2017-2023\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-08-16T12:54:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-22T12:17:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ole Petter Ottersen\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ole Petter Ottersen\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/16\\\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/16\\\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ole Petter Ottersen\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/2ab64a284b8dca132a740daeffe56f77\"},\"headline\":\"N\u00e5gra kommentarer och klarl\u00e4gganden efter oredlighetsbeslutet den 25 juni\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-16T12:54:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-22T12:17:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/16\\\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":958,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"ethics\",\"forskning\",\"Research\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Ethics\",\"Research\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/16\\\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/16\\\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/16\\\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\\\/\",\"name\":\"N\u00e5gra kommentarer och klarl\u00e4gganden efter oredlighetsbeslutet den 25 juni - Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet 2017-2023\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-08-16T12:54:30+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-22T12:17:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/16\\\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/16\\\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/2018\\\/08\\\/16\\\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"N\u00e5gra kommentarer och klarl\u00e4gganden efter oredlighetsbeslutet den 25 juni\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet 2017-2023\",\"description\":\"Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Karolinska Institutet\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/42\\\/2021\\\/08\\\/ki_logo_liggande_exempel.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/42\\\/2021\\\/08\\\/ki_logo_liggande_exempel.jpg\",\"width\":780,\"height\":272,\"caption\":\"Karolinska Institutet\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/2ab64a284b8dca132a740daeffe56f77\",\"name\":\"Ole Petter Ottersen\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f460c607db1d115b31ad0376d12f626699f2184d01551516f581833f4823b3ea?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f460c607db1d115b31ad0376d12f626699f2184d01551516f581833f4823b3ea?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/f460c607db1d115b31ad0376d12f626699f2184d01551516f581833f4823b3ea?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ole Petter Ottersen\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/blog.ki.se\\\/rektor\\\/author\\\/rektoropo\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"N\u00e5gra kommentarer och klarl\u00e4gganden efter oredlighetsbeslutet den 25 juni - Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet 2017-2023","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"N\u00e5gra kommentarer och klarl\u00e4gganden efter oredlighetsbeslutet den 25 juni - Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet 2017-2023","og_description":"English version below Flera av de som \u00e4r ber\u00f6rda av beslutet den 25 juni om oredlighet i forskning (g\u00e4llande Macchiarini-\u00e4rendet) har \u00f6verklagat beslutet till f\u00f6rvaltningsr\u00e4tten respektive beg\u00e4rt ompr\u00f6vning av beslutet […]","og_url":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/","og_site_name":"Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet 2017-2023","article_published_time":"2018-08-16T12:54:30+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-22T12:17:41+00:00","author":"Ole Petter Ottersen","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ole Petter Ottersen","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/"},"author":{"name":"Ole Petter Ottersen","@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/#\/schema\/person\/2ab64a284b8dca132a740daeffe56f77"},"headline":"N\u00e5gra kommentarer och klarl\u00e4gganden efter oredlighetsbeslutet den 25 juni","datePublished":"2018-08-16T12:54:30+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-22T12:17:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/"},"wordCount":958,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/#organization"},"keywords":["ethics","forskning","Research"],"articleSection":["Ethics","Research"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/","url":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/","name":"N\u00e5gra kommentarer och klarl\u00e4gganden efter oredlighetsbeslutet den 25 juni - Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet 2017-2023","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-08-16T12:54:30+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-22T12:17:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/2018\/08\/16\/nagra-kommentarer-och-klarlagganden-efter-oredlighetsbeslutet-den-25-juni\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"N\u00e5gra kommentarer och klarl\u00e4gganden efter oredlighetsbeslutet den 25 juni"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/#website","url":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/","name":"Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet 2017-2023","description":"Ole Petter Ottersen, president Karolinska Institutet","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/#organization","name":"Karolinska Institutet","url":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/42\/2021\/08\/ki_logo_liggande_exempel.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/42\/2021\/08\/ki_logo_liggande_exempel.jpg","width":780,"height":272,"caption":"Karolinska Institutet"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/#\/schema\/person\/2ab64a284b8dca132a740daeffe56f77","name":"Ole Petter Ottersen","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f460c607db1d115b31ad0376d12f626699f2184d01551516f581833f4823b3ea?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f460c607db1d115b31ad0376d12f626699f2184d01551516f581833f4823b3ea?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f460c607db1d115b31ad0376d12f626699f2184d01551516f581833f4823b3ea?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ole Petter Ottersen"},"url":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/author\/rektoropo\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/100"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1666"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1666\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1688,"href":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1666\/revisions\/1688"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.ki.se\/rektor\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}